<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Administered Uncertainty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughtheory.org/content/administered-uncertainty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/administered-uncertainty/</link>
	<description>theory in the rough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:54:32 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: L Magee</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/administered-uncertainty/comment-page-1/#comment-62576</link>
		<dc:creator>L Magee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 04:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=830#comment-62576</guid>
		<description>Belated coda to this dilemma: the exciting &quot;code&quot; was the inclusion of a question in the survey asking students for their student number. Notwithstanding they had entered this to access the system in the first place. To turn from Heisenberg to Godel: we now have both a consistent and complete set of student/session registrations. Some complex transformations were also required to reconfigure these relationships however: the download format presents the student and session times in an &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;admirably normalised&lt;/a&gt; (if practically unhelpful) state.

As a side note, current theory on the business model of the company behind the &quot;university online environment&quot; is that the image buttons it uses to submit (and confirm, and re-confirm) actions are surreptitiously tied to Google Ads - adding immeasurably to the company&#039;s shareholder value with every &quot;click-through&quot;, at some modest expense to the system&#039;s usability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belated coda to this dilemma: the exciting &#8220;code&#8221; was the inclusion of a question in the survey asking students for their student number. Notwithstanding they had entered this to access the system in the first place. To turn from Heisenberg to Godel: we now have both a consistent and complete set of student/session registrations. Some complex transformations were also required to reconfigure these relationships however: the download format presents the student and session times in an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization" rel="nofollow">admirably normalised</a> (if practically unhelpful) state.</p>
<p>As a side note, current theory on the business model of the company behind the &#8220;university online environment&#8221; is that the image buttons it uses to submit (and confirm, and re-confirm) actions are surreptitiously tied to Google Ads &#8211; adding immeasurably to the company&#8217;s shareholder value with every &#8220;click-through&#8221;, at some modest expense to the system&#8217;s usability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
