Comments on: Assembling an Abstraction

By: Roughtheory.org » Holding Patterns

Roughtheory.org » Holding Patterns — Fri, 18 May 2007 15:32:47 +0000

[...] from Larval Subjects continues our recent conversation, following up on the issue of how to conceptualise abstractions within [...]

By: Rough Theory-- Placeholders for Future Thought « Larval Subjects .

Rough Theory-- Placeholders for Future Thought « Larval Subjects . — Fri, 18 May 2007 05:39:00 +0000

[...] and I have been working through with regard to abstract categories and populations. In a recent post responding to my post on populations and constellations, Nicole wrote: Tacitly, this formulation [...]

By: Roughtheory.org » The Negative of the Negative

Roughtheory.org » The Negative of the Negative — Thu, 17 May 2007 21:23:01 +0000

[...] 2005 « Assembling an Abstraction Email It | Print It The Negative of the Negative Posted by N Pepperell [...]

By: Indeterminate Thoughts on Determinate Negation « Grundlegung

Indeterminate Thoughts on Determinate Negation « Grundlegung — Thu, 17 May 2007 17:47:33 +0000

[...] before finishing this post by NP’s redemption of a promise to write on a similar topic here (see also Sinthome’s reply). Hopefully, there should not be too much redundancy in the [...]

By: Rough Theory-- The Critical Edition « Larval Subjects .

Rough Theory-- The Critical Edition « Larval Subjects . — Wed, 16 May 2007 17:14:08 +0000

[...] as meandering, anarchic, and without coherence. N.Pepperell of Rough Theory has written a nice response to my discussion yesterday on constellations and populations, raising some important and forceful [...]