<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1:  Value and Its Form &#8211; from Deduction to Dialectic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1g/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1g/</link>
	<description>theory in the rough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:54:32 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: A Way of Visualising Abstract Labour and Value</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1g/comment-page-1/#comment-26514</link>
		<dc:creator>Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: A Way of Visualising Abstract Labour and Value</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1g/#comment-26514</guid>
		<description>[...] I find it useful to think about abstract labour in terms of sets and subsets, each enacted in collective practice. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I find it useful to think about abstract labour in terms of sets and subsets, each enacted in collective practice. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What in the hell &#8230; :: &#8230; does Marx mean by free labor? :: February :: 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1g/comment-page-1/#comment-25217</link>
		<dc:creator>What in the hell &#8230; :: &#8230; does Marx mean by free labor? :: February :: 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1g/#comment-25217</guid>
		<description>[...] of the point that I take NP to be making about Marx&#8217;s voice in her extended and excellent series of posts on the beginning of _Capital 1_ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the point that I take NP to be making about Marx&#8217;s voice in her extended and excellent series of posts on the beginning of _Capital 1_ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: The Universal as Particular</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1g/comment-page-1/#comment-20652</link>
		<dc:creator>Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: The Universal as Particular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 08:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1g/#comment-20652</guid>
		<description>[...] I think that some important elements of Marx’s critique hinge on the notion that abstract labour is collective labour - but collective labour in a specific, alienated form - collective labour as a specific form of unintentional domination. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I think that some important elements of Marx’s critique hinge on the notion that abstract labour is collective labour &#8211; but collective labour in a specific, alienated form &#8211; collective labour as a specific form of unintentional domination. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Subjects, Objects and Things in Between</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1g/comment-page-1/#comment-20152</link>
		<dc:creator>Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Subjects, Objects and Things in Between</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1g/#comment-20152</guid>
		<description>[...] Nevertheless, this small hint begins to react back on the modes of presentation with which this text begins, and the strategic intention of the earlier sections becomes a bit clearer. At this point, it begins to become clear that the opening definitions, which appear to concern certain economic concepts about material wealth, are always and already quite sweeping categories capturing forms of subjectivity - encompassing modes of the experience of self, forms of embodiment, possible means of practising selves in their self-relation, relation to others, and relation to a nonhuman environment. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nevertheless, this small hint begins to react back on the modes of presentation with which this text begins, and the strategic intention of the earlier sections becomes a bit clearer. At this point, it begins to become clear that the opening definitions, which appear to concern certain economic concepts about material wealth, are always and already quite sweeping categories capturing forms of subjectivity &#8211; encompassing modes of the experience of self, forms of embodiment, possible means of practising selves in their self-relation, relation to others, and relation to a nonhuman environment. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
