<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1:  Subjects, Objects and Things in Between</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1h/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1h/</link>
	<description>theory in the rough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:23:58 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Fragment on Form and Content</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1h/comment-page-1/#comment-23281</link>
		<dc:creator>Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Fragment on Form and Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1h/#comment-23281</guid>
		<description>[...] The passage suggests that there is a material content - use value - that is timeless and “true”, which comes in history to be covered over by arbitrary social “forms”, which are contingent and ephemeral. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The passage suggests that there is a material content &#8211; use value &#8211; that is timeless and “true”, which comes in history to be covered over by arbitrary social “forms”, which are contingent and ephemeral. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Not Knowing Where to Have It</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1h/comment-page-1/#comment-20258</link>
		<dc:creator>Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Not Knowing Where to Have It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1h/#comment-20258</guid>
		<description>[...] the last instalment, I suggested that the first chapter should be read as a sort of immanent dialectical unfolding of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the last instalment, I suggested that the first chapter should be read as a sort of immanent dialectical unfolding of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recording Surface :: Back :: October :: 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1h/comment-page-1/#comment-20209</link>
		<dc:creator>Recording Surface :: Back :: October :: 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1h/#comment-20209</guid>
		<description>[...] Roughtheory&#8217;s fabulous series of posts on the first chapter of Capital, the latest of which here, and Scandalum Magnatum&#8217;s insightful notes on Keynes, the latest of which is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Roughtheory&#8217;s fabulous series of posts on the first chapter of Capital, the latest of which here, and Scandalum Magnatum&#8217;s insightful notes on Keynes, the latest of which is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roughtheory.org &#187; What Presses Now</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1h/comment-page-1/#comment-20202</link>
		<dc:creator>Roughtheory.org &#187; What Presses Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 03:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1h/#comment-20202</guid>
		<description>[...] quotes a passage that expresses one of the forms of perception and thought I&#8217;ve recently been suggesting Marx is trying to ground in Capital - the distinction between a timeless &#8220;material&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] quotes a passage that expresses one of the forms of perception and thought I&#8217;ve recently been suggesting Marx is trying to ground in Capital &#8211; the distinction between a timeless &#8220;material&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natural&#8217;s Not In It &#171; Grundlegung</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1h/comment-page-1/#comment-20159</link>
		<dc:creator>Natural&#8217;s Not In It &#171; Grundlegung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 02:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/capital_1h/#comment-20159</guid>
		<description>[...] Subjects, Objects and Things in Between  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Subjects, Objects and Things in Between  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
