<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Roughtheory.org &#187; Critical Theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughtheory.org/content/category/critical-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughtheory.org</link>
	<description>theory in the rough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Elliptical Critique</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/elliptical-critique/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/elliptical-critique/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N Pepperell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abstraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital v.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contradiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fetish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Materialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Reflexivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Movements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Light posting for the moment, as it&#8217;s the beginning of our term here, and so things are quite hectic, but I wanted to pick up on one small point that had occurred to me in the course of responding to one of roger&#8217;s recent posts on Marx.
I&#8217;ve written quite a lot, at various times, on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/elliptical-critique/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Theatricality, Critical Standpoint, and the &#8220;Reality&#8221; of All Moments of Social Experience</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/theatricality-critical-standpoint-and-reality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/theatricality-critical-standpoint-and-reality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N Pepperell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital v.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contradiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fetish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Materialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metatheory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Reflexivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology of Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay&#8230; this post originated as a comment to add to the discussion with roger and demet in the thread below, but grew a bit cancerous, so I&#8217;m elevating it to post status.  What I&#8217;ve done here is to replicate the content of my final comment to roger, and then added underneath it what would [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/theatricality-critical-standpoint-and-reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/for-roger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/for-roger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N Pepperell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abstraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital v.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grundrisse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roger is complaining about the long silence, and asking me to recycle old content if nothing else to keep things a bit noisier around here&#8230;  I had been planning to break my silence with a post about sex in Capital (all together now:  &#8220;ewwww!&#8221;), but since I keep having to defer writing that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/for-roger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immanence and Materialism Conference Talk</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/immanence-and-materialism-conference-talk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/immanence-and-materialism-conference-talk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N Pepperell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abstraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital v.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empiricism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fetish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grundrisse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Materialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metatheory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Reflexivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another talk below the fold&#8230;  this time from the Immanence and Materialism conference &#8211; which proved to be a very good event, with a collection of excellent papers that, I understand, will soon be collected for online publication at a conference website &#8211; I&#8217;ll post a link to the blog when I have one. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/immanence-and-materialism-conference-talk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marx &amp; Philosophy Society Talk</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/marx-philosophy-society-talk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/marx-philosophy-society-talk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 01:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N Pepperell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Capital v.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empiricism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic of Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metatheory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phenomenology of Spirit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Reflexivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will put up a proper version of this paper on the Marx &#038; Philosophy Society website soon.  I just wanted to post the text of the actual talk here for archiving purposes in the interim.
The event was fantastic, and the discussion following the paper was rich and thought-provoking &#8211; it&#8217;s a wonderful event, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/marx-philosophy-society-talk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thesis Workshop: With What Must the Thesis Begin?</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/thesis-workshop-with-what-must-the-thesis-begin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/thesis-workshop-with-what-must-the-thesis-begin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N Pepperell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abstraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital v.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contradiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empiricism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fetish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Materialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metatheory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scratchpad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Reflexivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Manual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This coming Friday, I have to fulfil a mandatory pre-submission requirement for the thesis that basically involves presenting on the structure and the major claims of the thesis, and then taking questions from faculty and students who happen to attend the event.  The faculty who attend are provided with the abstract, first chapter, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/thesis-workshop-with-what-must-the-thesis-begin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thesis Workshop: Introduction &#8211; Historical Materialism and Real Abstraction</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/thesis-workshop-introduction-historical-materialism-and-real-abstraction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/thesis-workshop-introduction-historical-materialism-and-real-abstraction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 21:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N Pepperell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abstraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contradiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empiricism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fetish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Materialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metatheory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scratchpad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Reflexivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Manual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a bit rough and ready, but I&#8217;ll post the working introduction to the thesis here anyway.  If I keep this introduction in anything like its current form, I&#8217;ll need to make some slight modifications to several of the later chapters, since the introduction currently covers some of the ground discussed in later chapters, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/thesis-workshop-introduction-historical-materialism-and-real-abstraction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thesis Workshop: What a Piece of Work Is Man</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/thesis-workshop-what-a-piece-of-work-is-man/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/thesis-workshop-what-a-piece-of-work-is-man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 05:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N Pepperell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abstraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital v.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contradiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empiricism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fetish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Materialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metatheory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scratchpad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Reflexivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Manual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay.  Last substantive chapter of the thesis.  This chapter was very difficult to write.  I think it was worth the difficulty.  But perhaps that&#8217;s just relief at finishing the argument&#8230;
This chapter outlines the derivation of the category of labour-power, explores how this derivation fundamentally alters our sense of the opening categories, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/thesis-workshop-what-a-piece-of-work-is-man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thesis Workshop: Hic Rhodus, Hic Salta</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/thesis-workshop-hic-rhodus-hic-salta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/thesis-workshop-hic-rhodus-hic-salta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 05:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N Pepperell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abstraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital v.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contradiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empiricism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fetish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Materialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metatheory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scratchpad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Reflexivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Manual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that we&#8217;ve finally escaped chapter 3 of Capital, a quick breeze through chapters 4 and 5, focussing on the imagery in chapter 4 of capital-as-Geist, and then on the impasse Marx sets up in chapter 5, as a wedge through which he will drive the category of labour-power in the following chapter.  
Chapter [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/thesis-workshop-hic-rhodus-hic-salta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thesis Workshop: Crossed Circuits</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/thesis-workshop-crossed-circuits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/thesis-workshop-crossed-circuits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 06:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>N Pepperell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abstraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital v.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contradiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empiricism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fetish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Materialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metatheory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy of History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scratchpad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Reflexivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Manual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After this chapter, readers will finally be able to make their escape from the deconstructive thicket that is the third chapter of Capital.  Before we part ways with this chapter, though, Marx engages in some extremely clever moves to begin to open a wedge through which he will finally drive the category of capital [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/thesis-workshop-crossed-circuits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
