<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Constituting Voices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughtheory.org/content/constituting-voices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/constituting-voices/</link>
	<description>theory in the rough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:54:32 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: N Pepperell</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/constituting-voices/comment-page-1/#comment-20816</link>
		<dc:creator>N Pepperell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 03:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/constituting-voices/#comment-20816</guid>
		<description>Hey Joe - It&#039;s something that&#039;s struck me very strongly in your writing, although I&#039;ve never had occasion to mention it (I&#039;m also always a bit self-conscious when I comment on others&#039; styles, as I don&#039;t know how idiosyncratically I &quot;read&quot; other people...).  I hadn&#039;t realised it was also a substantive focus of your work, but it makes a great deal of sense...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Joe &#8211; It&#8217;s something that&#8217;s struck me very strongly in your writing, although I&#8217;ve never had occasion to mention it (I&#8217;m also always a bit self-conscious when I comment on others&#8217; styles, as I don&#8217;t know how idiosyncratically I &#8220;read&#8221; other people&#8230;).  I hadn&#8217;t realised it was also a substantive focus of your work, but it makes a great deal of sense&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Kugelmass</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/constituting-voices/comment-page-1/#comment-20813</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Kugelmass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/constituting-voices/#comment-20813</guid>
		<description>NP,

Thank you so much.

&lt;i&gt;Like all of Joe’s work, this piece has a multi-layered - one almost wants to say musical - structure to its argument, making excerpts a particularly problematic way of rendering its sense.&lt;/i&gt;

It is exhilarating to be characterized this way. My first major graduate paper, which I am working on publishing, was on Huxley and musical counterpoint; my first Valve post was on opera and narrative form; my dissertation is built around theses on &lt;i&gt;Finnegans Wake&lt;/i&gt;, a novel that constantly assumes musical shapes. Musical form is central to the way I read and write, and I really blush to be read so acutely and generously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NP,</p>
<p>Thank you so much.</p>
<p><i>Like all of Joe’s work, this piece has a multi-layered &#8211; one almost wants to say musical &#8211; structure to its argument, making excerpts a particularly problematic way of rendering its sense.</i></p>
<p>It is exhilarating to be characterized this way. My first major graduate paper, which I am working on publishing, was on Huxley and musical counterpoint; my first Valve post was on opera and narrative form; my dissertation is built around theses on <i>Finnegans Wake</i>, a novel that constantly assumes musical shapes. Musical form is central to the way I read and write, and I really blush to be read so acutely and generously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
