Comments on: Marx & Philosophy Society Talk http://www.roughtheory.org/content/marx-philosophy-society-talk/ theory in the rough Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:23:58 +1100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: john garvey http://www.roughtheory.org/content/marx-philosophy-society-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-174289 john garvey Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:47:01 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=884#comment-174289 I thought I had included the link but it appears you found it on your own. This morning, it appears to be malfunctioning. I thought I had included the link but it appears you found it on your own. This morning, it appears to be malfunctioning.

]]> By: N Pepperell http://www.roughtheory.org/content/marx-philosophy-society-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-174282 N Pepperell Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:02:23 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=884#comment-174282 Ah! <a href="http://state.blogsport.de/2009/07/20/the-systematic-character-of-social-domination/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">here</a>... Ah! here…

]]> By: N Pepperell http://www.roughtheory.org/content/marx-philosophy-society-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-174280 N Pepperell Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:15:29 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=884#comment-174280 Hey John - Sorry for the lag responding - it's the beginning of the term here, and my teaching days this term are particularly long, so I haven't been online. Yes: I would definitely like the link, if you have it handy. Once things calm down again (it must calm down at some point, I keep telling myself), I want to do a series of posts on the ontological status of value - I'd very much like to read others who are also looking at the retroactive character of the category. Many thanks... Hey John – Sorry for the lag responding – it’s the beginning of the term here, and my teaching days this term are particularly long, so I haven’t been online. Yes: I would definitely like the link, if you have it handy. Once things calm down again (it must calm down at some point, I keep telling myself), I want to do a series of posts on the ontological status of value – I’d very much like to read others who are also looking at the retroactive character of the category. Many thanks…

]]> By: john garvey http://www.roughtheory.org/content/marx-philosophy-society-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-174221 john garvey Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:35:03 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=884#comment-174221 I just came across a post that you might find interesting. The author(s) write: "Whether one's own productive investment is of "value" can only be determined retroactively." If you read German, there's more of the text available. John I just came across a post that you might find interesting. The author(s) write: “Whether one’s own productive investment is of “value” can only be determined retroactively.” If you read German, there’s more of the text available.

John

]]> By: N Pepperell http://www.roughtheory.org/content/marx-philosophy-society-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-169675 N Pepperell Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:36:38 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=884#comment-169675 Hey Nate - Good to see you :-) I have a cold at the moment (it waited long enough for me to finish my conference obligations, rather than descending as soon as the term was over, as it usually does... ;-P), so a bit fuzzy right now. If you have the time to look at it, I think you would also like the article John Garvey recommended above - for much the same reason. More soon... Hey Nate – Good to see you :-) I have a cold at the moment (it waited long enough for me to finish my conference obligations, rather than descending as soon as the term was over, as it usually does… ;-P), so a bit fuzzy right now. If you have the time to look at it, I think you would also like the article John Garvey recommended above – for much the same reason.

More soon…

]]> By: Nate http://www.roughtheory.org/content/marx-philosophy-society-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-169611 Nate Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:17:54 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=884#comment-169611 hey NP, I'm late, cursory, and off topic as usual - just wanted to say thanks for that point about the lithographs and incorporation of workers' bodies into products. I'm going to borrow that at some point. I hope you're well. cheers, Nate hey NP,
I’m late, cursory, and off topic as usual – just wanted to say thanks for that point about the lithographs and incorporation of workers’ bodies into products. I’m going to borrow that at some point.
I hope you’re well.
cheers,
Nate

]]> By: N Pepperell http://www.roughtheory.org/content/marx-philosophy-society-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-168490 N Pepperell Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:29:03 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=884#comment-168490 Hi John - sorry to leave your comment hanging for so long - I was putting together a paper, and then caught up in a conference, and in crashing after the conference, and so I haven't been much online. I've read CLR James, but it's been quite a while - I really should look back at it. I did an earlier thesis on the <em>Socialisme ou Barbarie</em> group, and read him alongside that work, IIRC... Part of the text, for the curious, is <a href="http://www.marxists.org/archive/james-clr/works/dialecti/index.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">online</a> - not the whole, unfortunately... Hi John – sorry to leave your comment hanging for so long – I was putting together a paper, and then caught up in a conference, and in crashing after the conference, and so I haven’t been much online. I’ve read CLR James, but it’s been quite a while – I really should look back at it. I did an earlier thesis on the Socialisme ou Barbarie group, and read him alongside that work, IIRC… Part of the text, for the curious, is online – not the whole, unfortunately…

]]> By: john garvey http://www.roughtheory.org/content/marx-philosophy-society-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-166327 john garvey Sun, 14 Jun 2009 01:33:49 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=884#comment-166327 It's really quite fascinating. I went to your blog to write about something else and didn't know that you had sent another message. But, since I sent you my messages, I had been led to the Gellert lithographs by another circuit. I'll look more at them. But back to why I was going to write--I wonder if you have come across or read CLR James's Notes on Dialectics from 1948. If not, I suggest that you find a copy. It’s really quite fascinating. I went to your blog to write about something else and didn’t know that you had sent another message. But, since I sent you my messages, I had been led to the Gellert lithographs by another circuit. I’ll look more at them.

But back to why I was going to write–I wonder if you have come across or read CLR James’s Notes on Dialectics from 1948. If not, I suggest that you find a copy.

]]> By: N Pepperell http://www.roughtheory.org/content/marx-philosophy-society-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-166193 N Pepperell Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:52:28 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=884#comment-166193 By the way, I was just looking back through Hugo Gellert's <em>Capital in Lithographs</em> for an unrelated reason today, and was struck by the ways in which the work confronts the reader with images of the physical incorporation of the labourer into the product - e.g., <a href="http://www.graphicwitness.org/contemp/marx23.htm"target="_blank" rel="nofollow">here</a> or <a href="http://www.graphicwitness.org/contemp/marx25.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">here</a>. By the way, I was just looking back through Hugo Gellert’s Capital in Lithographs for an unrelated reason today, and was struck by the ways in which the work confronts the reader with images of the physical incorporation of the labourer into the product – e.g., here or here.

]]> By: john garvey http://www.roughtheory.org/content/marx-philosophy-society-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-165486 john garvey Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:11:51 +0000 http://www.roughtheory.org/?p=884#comment-165486 Thank you for such a thoughtful response. Thank you for such a thoughtful response.

]]>