<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Preparing for Fragmentation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughtheory.org/content/preparing-for-fragmentation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/preparing-for-fragmentation/</link>
	<description>theory in the rough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:54:32 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: N Pepperell</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/preparing-for-fragmentation/comment-page-1/#comment-22339</link>
		<dc:creator>N Pepperell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/preparing-for-fragmentation/#comment-22339</guid>
		<description>Hey Adam - I had considered the Postone, but it&#039;s fairly dense text, for the most part.  He might have an article that might be more appropriate - it might be worth my hunting around in his other publications to see.  I had also considered the Horkheimer but, on a look back, feel that it&#039;s probably also too dense.  It&#039;s sort of reassuring, though, to hear similar things come to mind for someone else :-)

I&#039;ve considered perhaps some excerpts from more aphoristically structured Frankfurt School material.  I&#039;ve also considered using part of Postone&#039;s chapter on the first generation Frankfurt School, as that one is a bit more accessible, I think, than the more theoretical chapters.

The Geuss is a good idea - I&#039;ll have a flip through and see what could be excerpted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Adam &#8211; I had considered the Postone, but it&#8217;s fairly dense text, for the most part.  He might have an article that might be more appropriate &#8211; it might be worth my hunting around in his other publications to see.  I had also considered the Horkheimer but, on a look back, feel that it&#8217;s probably also too dense.  It&#8217;s sort of reassuring, though, to hear similar things come to mind for someone else :-)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve considered perhaps some excerpts from more aphoristically structured Frankfurt School material.  I&#8217;ve also considered using part of Postone&#8217;s chapter on the first generation Frankfurt School, as that one is a bit more accessible, I think, than the more theoretical chapters.</p>
<p>The Geuss is a good idea &#8211; I&#8217;ll have a flip through and see what could be excerpted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Leeds</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/preparing-for-fragmentation/comment-page-1/#comment-22337</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Leeds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/preparing-for-fragmentation/#comment-22337</guid>
		<description>The first two chapters of Postone&#039;s Time, Labor, and Social Domination would be my obvious first pick. Also, that Horkheimer essay, Traditional and Critical Theory. But I&#039;m not sure if those count as &quot;accessible&quot;. More accessible might be the little book (or chapters of it) by Raymond Geuss, The Idea of a Critical Theory, that lays out the arguments for different kinds of Marxist theories called &#039;critical&#039; very very clearly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first two chapters of Postone&#8217;s Time, Labor, and Social Domination would be my obvious first pick. Also, that Horkheimer essay, Traditional and Critical Theory. But I&#8217;m not sure if those count as &#8220;accessible&#8221;. More accessible might be the little book (or chapters of it) by Raymond Geuss, The Idea of a Critical Theory, that lays out the arguments for different kinds of Marxist theories called &#8216;critical&#8217; very very clearly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
