<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science of Logic Reading Group: Introduction (Updated and Bounced to the Top of the Page!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughtheory.org/content/sol_intro1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/sol_intro1/</link>
	<description>theory in the rough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:23:58 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: N Pepperell</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/sol_intro1/comment-page-1/#comment-23402</link>
		<dc:creator>N Pepperell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 02:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/sol_intro1/#comment-23402</guid>
		<description>Hey rob - good to hear from you!  I&#039;m sure the discussion will continue for a while, and will revisit earlier sections as well - happy to have you contributing when you can.

If you&#039;d like, I can set up a posting account for you (similar to what I&#039;ve done for L Magee), so that you have a bit more control over how your post displays, and don&#039;t have to post in the comments.  For longer content, this can work a bit better, as you can save as you go, and edit more easily.  You can also &quot;serialise&quot; content over several posts, if you want to say more than seems good for one post (my normal &quot;substantive&quot; blog posts are around 2000-3000 words, with the occasional 5000-word sprawl - much beyond this, and it starts getting past what I feel I can comfortably hold in my head at one time, so I figure it&#039;s also beyond what readers can comfortably digest...).

Let me know - posting accounts are easily done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey rob &#8211; good to hear from you!  I&#8217;m sure the discussion will continue for a while, and will revisit earlier sections as well &#8211; happy to have you contributing when you can.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like, I can set up a posting account for you (similar to what I&#8217;ve done for L Magee), so that you have a bit more control over how your post displays, and don&#8217;t have to post in the comments.  For longer content, this can work a bit better, as you can save as you go, and edit more easily.  You can also &#8220;serialise&#8221; content over several posts, if you want to say more than seems good for one post (my normal &#8220;substantive&#8221; blog posts are around 2000-3000 words, with the occasional 5000-word sprawl &#8211; much beyond this, and it starts getting past what I feel I can comfortably hold in my head at one time, so I figure it&#8217;s also beyond what readers can comfortably digest&#8230;).</p>
<p>Let me know &#8211; posting accounts are easily done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/sol_intro1/comment-page-1/#comment-23401</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 01:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/sol_intro1/#comment-23401</guid>
		<description>Hey NP

About ten years ago I wrote something in the vicinity of 18,000 words on the intro and the post-intro (&quot;With what must the science begin&quot;) to the science of logic.

I&#039;m guessing that that might be a bit more than you&#039;re after here....

Don&#039;t have a great deal of net access at the moment, but I&#039;ll see what I can do about contributing sometime in the near future.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey NP</p>
<p>About ten years ago I wrote something in the vicinity of 18,000 words on the intro and the post-intro (&#8221;With what must the science begin&#8221;) to the science of logic.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing that that might be a bit more than you&#8217;re after here&#8230;.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t have a great deal of net access at the moment, but I&#8217;ll see what I can do about contributing sometime in the near future.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science of Logic, &#8220;Introduction&#8221; (Some More Random Observations) &#171; Perverse Egalitarianism</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/sol_intro1/comment-page-1/#comment-23146</link>
		<dc:creator>Science of Logic, &#8220;Introduction&#8221; (Some More Random Observations) &#171; Perverse Egalitarianism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 04:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/sol_intro1/#comment-23146</guid>
		<description>[...] January 4, 2008 by Mikhail Emelianov    [The beginning is here and more still here.] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] January 4, 2008 by Mikhail Emelianov    [The beginning is here and more still here.] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N Pepperell</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/sol_intro1/comment-page-1/#comment-23054</link>
		<dc:creator>N Pepperell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/sol_intro1/#comment-23054</guid>
		<description>I know that locally a number of people are still away on break, and it also can take a bit for people to gear up for discussion - it may be that early posts sit for a little bit, while people lurk and read on for a while.  But it&#039;s good to get things simmering...  And hopefully others will dive in as they can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that locally a number of people are still away on break, and it also can take a bit for people to gear up for discussion &#8211; it may be that early posts sit for a little bit, while people lurk and read on for a while.  But it&#8217;s good to get things simmering&#8230;  And hopefully others will dive in as they can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikhail Emelianov</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/content/sol_intro1/comment-page-1/#comment-23038</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikhail Emelianov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 02:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/content/sol_intro1/#comment-23038</guid>
		<description>being on different sides of the planet might be good for this reading exercise, i&#039;ll add more on the introduction later tonight (for me) and hopefully i won&#039;t be the only one to point out some interesting issues Hegel deals with - but i hope this gets things going a bit...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>being on different sides of the planet might be good for this reading exercise, i&#8217;ll add more on the introduction later tonight (for me) and hopefully i won&#8217;t be the only one to point out some interesting issues Hegel deals with &#8211; but i hope this gets things going a bit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
