<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marx</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roughtheory.org/marx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roughtheory.org</link>
	<description>theory in the rough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:20:06 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Use-value &#171; Praxis</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/marx/comment-page-1/#comment-43967</link>
		<dc:creator>Use-value &#171; Praxis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 20:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/marx/#comment-43967</guid>
		<description>[...] 6:59 pm   This is really just me going over ground that’s already been comprehensively covered by N Pepperell’s posts on the early chapters of ‘Capital’ (to which it’s just totally indebted, to the point of outright theft). It was all meant to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 6:59 pm   This is really just me going over ground that’s already been comprehensively covered by N Pepperell’s posts on the early chapters of ‘Capital’ (to which it’s just totally indebted, to the point of outright theft). It was all meant to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: A Close Reading of the Naming of the Fetish</title>
		<link>http://www.roughtheory.org/marx/comment-page-1/#comment-34349</link>
		<dc:creator>Roughtheory.org &#187; Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1: A Close Reading of the Naming of the Fetish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roughtheory.org/marx/#comment-34349</guid>
		<description>[...] entire long series on the first chapter of Capital, volume 1, was written as an exercise in unpacking Marx&#8217;s [...]
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] entire long series on the first chapter of Capital, volume 1, was written as an exercise in unpacking Marx&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

